An Essential Ingredient That Contributes A Significant...

1.Culture is a very important aspect of life that distinguishes people of one society from another. Worldwatch Institute (2010) page 7, defined culture as values, beliefs, customs, traditions, symbols, norms, and institutions which are combined to create the bonding life frames that shapes how humans behave. According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary (1828), culture is a way of thinking, behaving or working that exists in a place or organisation (such as business). What should be noted is that this culture differs from one area to another due to individual cultural systems. In Zimbabwe, culture is affected much by work, study, and family life. Work is an essential ingredient that contributes a significant percentage Zimbabwean culture. This work differs from one person to another depending on the attributes required. In our culture, work is vital since it defines the level of standards of living of a society. People of a certain society get their basic and luxurious needs from work. A person who works is regarded as organized and intelligent. In most cases, a person who does the lowest paid work such as a general hand or a house maid is regarded as an inferior and worthless person. In other words, a person working from a highly paid job is mostly respected than a general hand worker. All in all, work is vital in Zimbabwe and things not to live without. Study is a symbol of knowledge in our culture. People are encouraged to further their education for them to uplift theShow MoreRelatedAn Impact Assessment of Science and Technology Policy on National Development of Nigeria61708 Words   |  247 Pages The past ten years have provided me with immense opportunities to deepen my understanding of the programmes, activities and operations of the Federal Ministry of Science and Technology in Nigeria. During this period, I had the privilege to contribute to the policy process formulation and implementation of the Ministry. Also, I participated in various local and international fora for ST development including those organized by Nigerian Academy of Science, African Academy of Science, ThirdRead Morepaul hoang answers72561 Words   |  291 PagesDefinition of organizational culture, which affects management behaviour and management styles. Influences on recruitment include: †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ The candidate must ‘fit’ into the organization and adapt to its culture (â€Å"one of us† approach) Internal or external promotion – what is the norm? The person specification will be important to ensure that teams are united with a common purpose, e.g. a culture of hard working and motivated teachers. Organizational culture will also have some influence

Most Noticeable Good Essay Argument Topics

Most Noticeable Good Essay Argument Topics Good Essay Argument Topics Features When you compose an argumentative essay about video games there are lots of topics that you could consider. Since you may see, writing an argumentative essay on the majority of the available topics is a time-consuming process which demands lots of efforts and skills it's well worth trying as it is possible to acquire unforgettable experience. When writing a crucial composition, it's recommended to pick contradictive topics. Choosing topics for argumentative essays is crucial for your general success. Argumentative essays are a few of the best that you can write as a student. Moreover, in-text citations will present your awareness of the various papers formats. The thesis gives you a guideline about how to go about with writing the essay. What You Should Do to Find Out About Good Essay Argument Topics Before You're Left Behind If you are in possession of a valid issue and you may offer sufficien t arguments on it, then go with this. Essentially, it connects your evidence to your principal argument. Arguments always occur in a particular context. Finding the most suitable arguments will allow you to prove your point and win. Ideas, Formulas and Shortcuts for Good Essay Argument Topics In case you have questions or concerns, please feel free to get hold of your Smokin Joes representative. Clearly, you shouldn't purposely select a topic that will bore your audience. It's important to select debatable argumentative essay topics since you need opposing points you could counter to your own points. The key to decide on a great topic for an argumentative essay is to choose a subject where there's a lot of debates on topics or stances. The Secret to Good Essay Argument Topics After picking your subject, you should have the five varieties of arguments at the rear of your head throughout your writing. Remember that you may make funny argumentative essays if you do a few thi ngs. It's important to understand that essay topics are just basic ideas that leave you pondering an idea that might be a huge deal to somebody else. When you're picking your topic, remember that it's much simpler to write about something which you presently have interest ineven in case you don't know a good deal about it. The Good Essay Argument Topics Trap Argumentative research paper topics are a great deal much easier to find than to produce. Instead of just immediately writing about your argumentative essay topic, you first have to think about what it is you are likely to put back on your paper through a procedure of brainstorming and pre-writing. Ultimately, now that you're prepared to work on your paper, we wish to remind you of the significance of appropriate essay structure. Understanding how to compose a strong argumentative paper can help you advance your very own argumentative thinking. The New Fuss About Good Essay Argument Topics You don't need to acquire supe r technical with legal argumentative essays, but be certain to do your homework on what the present laws about your preferred topic actually say. Whichever topic you select, always don't forget the value of literature sources. It's possible to go for an intriguing topic from any area of science. Possessing excellent research abilities and selecting a superb topic is critical. Perform extensive research on the subject of your choice and make an impressive persuasive speech that individuals will remember for long. When you settle on the subject and select the position on which you will base your essay, the remainder of the job can then begin. It's essential not just to supply the evidence to back up your position but also to refute that of your opponents. To compose a terrific argumentative essay the students first must investigate several sides of the argument, which enables them to make an educated stance. Young writers may try simple on-line citation generators which are g enerally at no charge. You still must make an outstanding bit of writing. An argumentative essay is a certain sort of academic writing. Just comply with the guidelines stated above, and you will be well on your way to writing a fantastic persuasive essay. But What About Good Essay Argument Topics? An argumentative essay requires you to choose a topic and have a position on it. Our argumentative essay topic ideas are supposed to save your time when you have to choose what things to write about. Researching the topic will enable you to find out more about what fascinates you, and should you pick something you truly like, writing the essay will be more enjoyable. Selecting an excellent topic for your essay is among the most essential and frequently tricky parts for many students. If you would like a paper on this issue you aren't certain about, contact online writing service to acquire proper assistance. Inspiration to make your own advertising or media argumentative essay to pics isn't really hard to discover. Begin with general subjects that you are conversant with then narrow down to a particular topic. The only issue is that useful information is usually presented in parts on various webpages, and in order to have an entire picture you should surf the internet for hours gathering the data by pieces from different resources. Good Essay Argument Topics: No Longer a Mystery There are several argumentative essay topics. Weave in your perspective to turn your essay unique. Persuasive essays share a good deal of resemblance with argumentative essays. All persuasive essays are like argumentative essays. Good persuasive essay topics need to be persuasive. There are many intriguing topics that could be become a persuasive essay if you take the opportunity to consider about doing it. Should you need professional help with argumentative essay topics, don't hesitate to speak to us. At times you might require some expert help with argumentative essay topics. In choosing your topic, it's frequently a good notion to start with a subject which you already have some familiarity with. The topic has to be based on a great evidence base. You have to come across good evidence to strengthen your ideas in addition to examples to illustrate the evidence. Explain why the challenge is crucial. Key Pieces of Good Essay Argument Topics There are several steps that you should take so as to compose a fantastic essay. Think of what you know.

Federal Trade Comission Free Essays

In the given case, the Federal Trade Commission claimed that Texas Surgeons Independent Practice Association(IPA) of 26 general surgeons in the Austin, Texas and six competing medical practice groups who are the members of this association (the respondents), Texas Surgeons P. A. (â€Å"Texas Surgeons†), Austin Surgeons, P. We will write a custom essay sample on Federal Trade Comission or any similar topic only for you Order Now L. L. C. (â€Å"AS†), Austin Surgical Clinic Association, P. A. (â€Å"ASCA†), Bruce McDonald Associates, P. L. L. C. (â€Å"BMA†), Capital Surgeons Group, P. L. L. C. (â€Å"CSG†), Central Texas Surgical Associates, P. A. (â€Å"CTSA†), and Surgical Associates of Austin, P. A. (â€Å"SAA†), violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U. S. C.  § 45 by engaging in unlawful act of price fixing. FTC alleged complaint that the IPA organized collective refused to deal with two health plans, Blue cross Blue Shield and United Health Care of Texas, terminated the contract with Blue Cross Blue Shield and threatened to terminate contracts with the United Health Care of Texas if the payer refuse to agree with their demand of raising reimbursement rate. As per demand, both plans increased their rates. Blue Cross accepted a rate agreement with the respondents in early 1998 after facing problems getting an emergency room patient treated by a general surgeon. The respondents collectively secured rate agreement resulted nearly 30% above the April 1997 level. In this case, the practices of the respondents went against the welfare of the public, constitute unfair methods of competition and antitrust actions. This anti competitive action cost health plan, employers and patients, more than $1,000,000 for surgical services in 1998 and 1999 in the Austin, Texas area. In the mid-1970, the FTC formed a section within the Bureau of Competition to investigate potential anti trust violations involving healthcare. In the health care area, as in the case of any other field, the antitrust laws are enforced so check not only possible competitive harm but also the potential for pro competitive increase in efficiency, lower health care cost, provide better quality care to the consumers, enhance innovative strategy to provide improved quality care at low cost. Federal antitrust guidelines allow independent physicians to appoint a representative messenger to communicate with payers about fees and contract terms, but annot represent the competing physicians collectively. However, in this case, the Texas Surgeons IPA served as a vehicle for the six respondent medical practice groups to engage in actual refusals to deal, and to negotiate collectively, in order to receive higher prices from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and United Healthcare of Texas. The six r espondent medical practice groups furthered the unlawful act through their collective control of the Texas Surgeons IPA board of directors, and through their direct participation in collective fee negotiations between United and the Texas Surgeons IPA. The commission proposed a consent order as a remedy to prevent the respondent from getting indulge in future unlawful act that is alleged in the complaint while allowing respondents to engage in legitimate joint conduct. The proposed order prohibits the IPA from a) negotiating on behalf of any physician with health plans b) refusing to deal with health plan or threatening health plans to agree on their demand c) exchanging information among Austin area physicians regarding negotiations with any health plan regarding reimbursement terms d) determining the terms on which its members deal with health plans. The order contains three provisos that permit the respondents to 1. Negotiate for physicians limited to the same medical practice group; 2. Engage in conduct approved and supervised by the state of Texas; and 3. Engage in conduct that is reasonably necessary to operate ‘qualified risk- sharing joint arrangements- so long as they give adequate pre- notification. The commission’s proposal allows the IPA to avoid such claims of price- fixing and antitrust if it acts in one of two ways: ) Financial Risk Sharing: As a qualified managed care plan which allows competing providers to negotiate prices jointly without being charged with price fixing act by the Federal antitrust agencies if they share substantial financial risk on contracts . It means that participating providers share responsibility for staying within a defined budget. The antitrust agencies believe that the competing providers should work together to achieve common, procompetitive goals of reducing cost and impro ving quality. Share incentives could also focus on â€Å"quality† or Health outcome† factors. Both the way of risk sharing has potential of providing high quality care to the patient at low cost. 2) Messenger Model: The fifth provision (Section II. A. 5 of the proposed order) ensures that a neutral third party who is not a physician with an active practice in the Austin area, be the communicator between any respondent and any payer to deal with any terms. Under this arrangement, the network organization does not negotiate agreement with the payer about any term or price; it allows the individual providers to make an individual decision, based on proposal from payer. Physician individually, through third party, conveys and receives information, offers, and responses from the payers or providers. However, the individual providers can give â€Å"sign off† authority to network organization within specified range. In addition, the commission order ensures that any respondent who are intending to use messenger model arrangement should provide prior notification to the commission. Price- fixing agreements among the competitors are not accepted by law. It is considered serious act because the consumers, plans and employers pay heavy price for it such as, †¢ Consumers loss the benefits of competition Increases the health care cost; Blue Cross, United, their individual subscribers, and employers paid more than one million dollars were paid for the services of surgeons. Therefore, review of such cases is crucial to encourage the competitor to work together as a team to improve quality of services, while reducing cost. References http://www. cro well. com/documents/DOCASSOCFKTYPE_PRESENTATIONS_705. pdf http://www. accessmylibrary. com/article-1G1-77013366/texas-surgeons-settle-price. html http://www. ftc. gov/os/2000/05/texascmp. htm How to cite Federal Trade Comission, Papers Federal Trade Comission Free Essays In the given case, the Federal Trade Commission claimed that Texas Surgeons Independent Practice Association(IPA) of 26 general surgeons in the Austin, Texas and six competing medical practice groups who are the members of this association (the respondents), Texas Surgeons P. A. (â€Å"Texas Surgeons†), Austin Surgeons, P. We will write a custom essay sample on Federal Trade Comission or any similar topic only for you Order Now L. L. C. (â€Å"AS†), Austin Surgical Clinic Association, P. A. (â€Å"ASCA†), Bruce McDonald Associates, P. L. L. C. (â€Å"BMA†), Capital Surgeons Group, P. L. L. C. (â€Å"CSG†), Central Texas Surgical Associates, P. A. (â€Å"CTSA†), and Surgical Associates of Austin, P. A. (â€Å"SAA†), violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U. S. C.  § 45 by engaging in unlawful act of price fixing. FTC alleged complaint that the IPA organized collective refused to deal with two health plans, Blue cross Blue Shield and United Health Care of Texas, terminated the contract with Blue Cross Blue Shield and threatened to terminate contracts with the United Health Care of Texas if the payer refuse to agree with their demand of raising reimbursement rate. As per demand, both plans increased their rates. Blue Cross accepted a rate agreement with the respondents in early 1998 after facing problems getting an emergency room patient treated by a general surgeon. The respondents collectively secured rate agreement resulted nearly 30% above the April 1997 level. In this case, the practices of the respondents went against the welfare of the public, constitute unfair methods of competition and antitrust actions. This anti competitive action cost health plan, employers and patients, more than $1,000,000 for surgical services in 1998 and 1999 in the Austin, Texas area. In the mid-1970, the FTC formed a section within the Bureau of Competition to investigate potential anti trust violations involving healthcare. In the health care area, as in the case of any other field, the antitrust laws are enforced so check not only possible competitive harm but also the potential for pro competitive increase in efficiency, lower health care cost, provide better quality care to the consumers, enhance innovative strategy to provide improved quality care at low cost. Federal antitrust guidelines allow independent physicians to appoint a representative messenger to communicate with payers about fees and contract terms, but annot represent the competing physicians collectively. However, in this case, the Texas Surgeons IPA served as a vehicle for the six respondent medical practice groups to engage in actual refusals to deal, and to negotiate collectively, in order to receive higher prices from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and United Healthcare of Texas. The six r espondent medical practice groups furthered the unlawful act through their collective control of the Texas Surgeons IPA board of directors, and through their direct participation in collective fee negotiations between United and the Texas Surgeons IPA. The commission proposed a consent order as a remedy to prevent the respondent from getting indulge in future unlawful act that is alleged in the complaint while allowing respondents to engage in legitimate joint conduct. The proposed order prohibits the IPA from a) negotiating on behalf of any physician with health plans b) refusing to deal with health plan or threatening health plans to agree on their demand c) exchanging information among Austin area physicians regarding negotiations with any health plan regarding reimbursement terms d) determining the terms on which its members deal with health plans. The order contains three provisos that permit the respondents to 1. Negotiate for physicians limited to the same medical practice group; 2. Engage in conduct approved and supervised by the state of Texas; and 3. Engage in conduct that is reasonably necessary to operate ‘qualified risk- sharing joint arrangements- so long as they give adequate pre- notification. The commission’s proposal allows the IPA to avoid such claims of price- fixing and antitrust if it acts in one of two ways: ) Financial Risk Sharing: As a qualified managed care plan which allows competing providers to negotiate prices jointly without being charged with price fixing act by the Federal antitrust agencies if they share substantial financial risk on contracts . It means that participating providers share responsibility for staying within a defined budget. The antitrust agencies believe that the competing providers should work together to achieve common, procompetitive goals of reducing cost and impro ving quality. Share incentives could also focus on â€Å"quality† or Health outcome† factors. Both the way of risk sharing has potential of providing high quality care to the patient at low cost. 2) Messenger Model: The fifth provision (Section II. A. 5 of the proposed order) ensures that a neutral third party who is not a physician with an active practice in the Austin area, be the communicator between any respondent and any payer to deal with any terms. Under this arrangement, the network organization does not negotiate agreement with the payer about any term or price; it allows the individual providers to make an individual decision, based on proposal from payer. Physician individually, through third party, conveys and receives information, offers, and responses from the payers or providers. However, the individual providers can give â€Å"sign off† authority to network organization within specified range. In addition, the commission order ensures that any respondent who are intending to use messenger model arrangement should provide prior notification to the commission. Price- fixing agreements among the competitors are not accepted by law. It is considered serious act because the consumers, plans and employers pay heavy price for it such as, †¢ Consumers loss the benefits of competition Increases the health care cost; Blue Cross, United, their individual subscribers, and employers paid more than one million dollars were paid for the services of surgeons. Therefore, review of such cases is crucial to encourage the competitor to work together as a team to improve quality of services, while reducing cost. References http://www. cro well. com/documents/DOCASSOCFKTYPE_PRESENTATIONS_705. pdf http://www. accessmylibrary. com/article-1G1-77013366/texas-surgeons-settle-price. html http://www. ftc. gov/os/2000/05/texascmp. htm How to cite Federal Trade Comission, Essay examples